Skip to main content

They Could Not Accept Who Jesus Was, and They Took Offense at Him (Mark 6:1-6)

He departed from there and came to his native place, accompanied by his disciples. 2 When the sabbath came he began to teach in the synagogue, and many who heard him were astonished. They said, “Where did this man get all this? What kind of wisdom has been given him? What mighty deeds are wrought by his hands! 3 Is he not the carpenter, the son of Mary, and the brother of James and Joses and Judas and Simon? And are not his sisters here with us?” And they took offense at him. 4 Jesus said to them, “A prophet is not without honor except in his native place and among his own kin and in his own house.” 5 So he was not able to perform any mighty deed there, apart from curing a few sick people by laying his hands on them. 6 He was amazed at their lack of faith.

Mark places this scene right after several public signs of Jesus’ authority—calming the storm, freeing a man from a demon, healing a woman with a hemorrhage for twelve years, and raising a child from death’s grip (Mk. 4:35-5:43). Now Jesus returns to Nazareth with his disciples, and the setting shifts to the sabbath teaching in the synagogue. The first response is astonishment. The people can hear that he speaks with wisdom, and they know reports of mighty deeds done through him. But their astonishment quickly turns into resistance because they think they already know him.

Their questions show what blocks them. They reduce Jesus to the categories they can manage: a local craftsman, a familiar household, a known family circle. The townsfolk had known Jesus from his earliest years, so they assumed they already knew who he was. Instead of letting his wisdom and mighty deeds make them ponder, they brushed them aside and ‘took offense at him,’ rather than receiving him as he truly is. Matthew tells the same story in similar terms, including the conclusion that their lack of faith accompanied the lack of mighty deeds there (Mt. 13:54-58).

Jesus responds with a proverb about a prophet’s honor being refused in his own place, among kin, and within the household. That saying fits a long pattern in Israel’s Scriptures: God’s messengers are often rejected by those closest to them. Mark does not present Nazareth as the first time people struggle to grasp who Jesus is. Earlier, even the disciples were afraid and confused after one of his miracles, asking who he is (Mk. 4:41). In Nazareth, however, the resistance is not fear in the face of power; it is refusal in the face of familiarity. Luke’s Gospel expands this rejection into a sharper conflict, where the town’s resistance becomes open hostility (Lk. 4:16-30).

The line that can trouble readers is Mark’s statement that Jesus “was not able to perform any mighty deed there,” apart from healing a few by laying hands on them. Mark’s point is not that Jesus’ power is small or that he “runs out” of power. The same passage immediately reports real healings, and Mark has just narrated far greater works. The emphasis is on the town’s lack of faith—that is, their lack of trust—and the way such refusal shuts them off from what God is offering through Jesus. In Mark, faith is not a technique to force results; it is trust that opens one to receive God’s work. That is why Mark ends the scene with Jesus being amazed at their lack of faith. The tragedy is not ignorance; it is that those who know his ordinary life will not follow the evidence of his words and deeds to its conclusion: that God is at work in him in a way they did not expect.

In John’s Gospel, a similar reaction appears when people object to Jesus because they think they know his origin: “Is this not Jesus, the son of Joseph?” (Jn. 6:42). Across the Gospels, the pattern is consistent. The stumbling block is not that Jesus is too distant to be known; it is that he is too near to be accepted on God’s terms.

Lord Jesus, give us the humility to receive you as you truly are. Teach us to trust what God is doing, even when it challenges what we think we already know. Amen.
___________________
Sources and References
  • The Holy Bible: New American Bible, Revised Edition (NABRE), Mark 6:1-6.
  • The Ignatius Catholic Study Bible: The Gospel of Mark, commentary on Mark 5:39; 6:1-6 (p. 75).
  • Raymond E. Brown, Joseph A. Fitzmyer, and Roland E. Murphy, eds., The New Jerome Biblical Commentary (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1990), 608-609 (para. 37).
  • The Navarre Bible: St. Mark (Princeton, NJ: Scepter, 2005), commentary on Mark 6:1-8:30 (p. 182).
  • The Paulist Biblical Commentary (New York: Paulist Press, 2018), “Conclusion: A Visit to Nazareth (6:1-6a)” (p. 991).
  • John R. Donahue, S.J., and Daniel J. Harrington, S.J., The Jerome Biblical Commentary for the Twenty-First Century, 3rd fully revised ed. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2020), Mark section beginning p. 1256.

Comments